I think having him at LB was the best for SP while he was there. The ROI with him at LB is far greater than with him at FB....... hard to argue with the numbers #32 was putting up as well. #44 wouldn't have been leaps and bounds better than him but he was irreplaceable at LB.
I saw them play as youngsters growing up through middle school...I disagree about the FB numbers.
I think #44 would likely have been a top 2 FB in school history if put there. You're probably right- better to have him on D because we definitely needed him there, but in the last 15 years our fullbacks have the same stats year in and out no matter who is there **depending on how many games played. It's the system that produces numbers to a degree....would've just loved to have had a really good athlete there like we had when Bray was at that position given how heavily we rely on it.