Well, he is not me.
And I do not have multiple accounts. That is the exclusive province of Champ96 and theTrueDynasty.
Is Shelby going small 2A?
- Thread starter goldenlions04
- Start date
Well, he is not me.
And I do not have multiple accounts. That is the exclusive province of Champ96 and theTrueDynasty.
2a west has just as many top 4 ranked teams as 2aa. 2a seems more of a coin flip than 2aa. No one other than shelby have a chance. Just my opinion. That's out or respect for shelby. Not sarcasm
Those divided playoffs gave me 1 title head to head vs shelby. I prayed for a matchup with shelby. And got it. Nobody scared. Seems 2aa is cupcaking all the way to a title for shelby. This is only year left unless a non conference game happens. Which it wont. We haven't got the phone call yet about yall trying to schedule. So maybe yall scared just as much
I would have like to have seen ND vs Reidsville, too. After all, y’all did beat their conference mate, Cummings, worst than they did, 62-7. I think our defense by the end of last season was playing at such a high level, that it made it appeared that you guys were mediocre to these Reidsville guys. If those Mountain teams gave them all that they wanted, y’all most certainly could have beaten them, period. And as for as Northeastern is concerned, I’m going to always favor the more balanced, offensively, western teams.
Last edited:
I may change my name to Black And Gold Dynamite.Kind of catchy.
Some of our fans like to say that if we had scored that TD down in the end zone that turned into a pick 6, we would have won.
ND fans can be a bit biased... From what I saw that play gave you guys all the momentum and you did what championship teams do. You stepped on the throat. I think the game may have been closer but to my eyes you had the better all around team.
I will say this: you guys had trouble with Blake Stephens, our big DE. He would have been even more imposing against the offensive lines I saw in the 2A game.
Again, not saying we were out and out better than Rville or NE. But I would certainly like our chances.
He would have been imposing vs either team. Don't forget Northeastern had a really good defensive line, with 3 div 1 guys on it
I like it but the nchsaa clearly says your team must have at least 20 state titles to use Dynamite in your user
You bring that common opponent idea, but you and others said the Rams beating East Rutherford worse than Shelby did last year meant nothing?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Actually those divided titles have given you all 20.....but that is for another conversation. Good luck to the Rams tonight.
Good luck to the Lions as well. Hoping to see you guys in 3-4 weeks
Yep...
Along with a much shorter ex football/basketball/baseball player from ER..,
Wait this thread is about Shelby going small...
Sorry...
Ok.....I have been doing projection updates all week, and said it was only a 1/4 or 1/3 in chance that Shelby goes small, but with Anson out, Walkertown out, West Stanly out.....after tonight's results and it appears that 7 or 8 teams are in the running for the last 2 or 3 wild card spots and it will all come down to whatever the computer spits out in rankings......coupled with the fact that Shelby is tied with two others in ADM, including one of those bubble teams....i'm finally going to give in and say it is a 50/50 thing now and really could go either way....I will do a revised projection later and still list them in 2AA, but it's like a contested election that's going to require a recount....it really could come down to drawing out of a hat between Shelby and West Lincoln (and maybe Andrews, who I'm going to list as a wild card) to see which 1 or 2 go small or big
haven't heard for sure yet....but it would be possible for Bartlett-Yancey to be 9-2 and left out of playoffs.............
Nope...afraid not. We won titles in the 80s and 90s when there was no subdividing or alternate Association.
West Stanley was ranked 14th last week no way they don't make it.
They've always been divided in one way or another since 1929. Wilmington New Hanover beat Statesville 14-9 in the last open division playoff and that was in 1928.
Just got to beat the teams they let you play.
I'm not talking by class ... I'm talking open division. For example, there are 8 divisions now. In 1928, there was 1.
Think he confused them with Forest Hills as it appears they, along with Anson, were removed from the playoff participation pool.
Actually, the only way West Stanly makes it is if Mount Pleasant jumps from 74 to however high they have to jump to get a wild card....remember that league only gets 1 auto bid, and Anson's forfeiting that bid.....Mt Pleasant beat West Stanly and finishes ahead of them in conference by head to head tie break
If they finished 3rd, they can't leap frog the team that finished 2nd if the team that finished 2nd (Mt Pleasant) doesn't make the playoffs.....so if I'm right, West Stanly needs either MP's ranking to jump a lot from last week (which could happen, I just don't expect it to) and there be 2 extra spots open at the bottom (if they fight over last spot, MP gets it from head to head)....OR that for some reason I have my auto bid numbers wrong because of that the weirdness in that conference that came with Montgomery Central going 3A left them with only four football playing 2A schools....if it's like any other split conference with just 4 in one class, they only get one auto bid, that's Anson (what I've been trying to say for three days is that the MP/WS leap frog has nothing to do with the Anson fight and whether or not they get in, it's about conference standings finish, had WS beaten MP, then yes they'd be in no doubt as a wild card, but they finished 3rd, in a 1 auto bid league (i think), and the 2nd place team would have to qualify for playoffs before 3rd place team can qualify
Well.....MP & WS made it....problem I see is they should both be wild cards....along with 4 or 5 other things
Tarheel.....it appears that some rulings on tiebreaker Wildcards don’t match your projection.
At least ....on the preliminary. Let’s see how it shakes out.
At least ....on the preliminary. Let’s see how it shakes out.
Ok, one new change that I didn't know about and just found out: The often forgotten football only tiebreak to let one league get 2 teams seeded as conf. champions even applies in 2 way ties where a head to head winner really makes it not a tie, so both West Craven and Washington were seeded in the Tier of 1s
I see that....one tiebreak rule that must have changed is on Washington going as a 1....in the past they would have been with the 2s, not the 1s since it was a 2 way tie.....and Hertford Co. went with 2s instead of wild cards....even though their league only gets auto bids
Similar threads
