I strongly doubt anyone from Grimsley is reading a comment like I made and it's giving them motivation. What does that say about their offenses? Nothing. It goes more to say that in none those games was defense played well. They obviously weren't defensive struggles. These days it seems it's more about who can outscore the other than who can defend well. Does the saying "defense wins championships" not mean anything anymore? In the regular season, Grimsley allowed 13 ppg. In the playoffs so far, they've allowed 33.4 ppg. What's changed? Better competition? Okay, so you say better competition, some are bragging that Grimsley went through the Charlotte area gauntlet! So, through that gauntlet, Grimsley has allowed 20 ppg MORE than during the regular season. Was the competition from Charlotte that much more superior from that which they faced in the regular season? I doubt it. So, you and others are apparently getting offended by my opinion which is just as valid as anyone else's opinion on this board. If the competition from the Charlotte area wasn't that much more superior, which I agreed with that it isn't, then why is they allowing 33.4 ppg in the playoffs? Without emotionally looking which is hard for fans or those with anti-Charlotte bias to do, because both of those camps cause emotional reactions. Anyone who knows me and has read my posts over the last few years, will easily see my thoughts don't come from emotion, but from research, analysis, numbers and viewpoints of other commenters who are closer to the teams. I have no horse in the race and haven't this or any other season. In every playoff game, except the one against Hough, I picked Grimsley to win. So, no I don't have a pro-Charlotte area bias. The situation is those who are fans and those with an anti-Charlotte area bias tend to not like or agree with someone who tries to give an objective view. Do I have anything against Grimsley? No. Can I not stand to see teams from outside the Charlotte metro area do well when Charlotte area teams are eliminated? Not at all. In fact, I follow teams and playoffs on a national level, not just North Carolina. So, while many on this board focus only on North Carolina or a specific team or geographic area within North Carolina, I don't. Now I'll finish with this. There were a couple who like Massey's ratings and give them such credibility that they mentioned them on this thread as favoring Grimsley in this game. According to Massey, his ratings indicate New Bern should score 35 on Grimsley. With that being the case how does my comment, that with Grimsley's defense, New Bern could score 40-45 on them, make it seem I have some anti-Grimsley bias and New Bern scoring 40-45 on them is outside the realm of possibility?