Scotland vs 71st
- Thread starter JMACDE99
- Start date
The Fighting Scots should be as healthy as they have been going into 71st face. The Fighting Scots should be undefeated; however, they've played one of the toughest schedules in the state to this point. West Meck was a powerful opponent(sort of), but maybe not to the level of Mallard Creek or Hillside. I felt going into the season this would be a defining time for the Scoties to see where they stand. Right now, 71st is 6-1. I think athletically the teams are very even with a great nod to Scotland, but they say 71st is stronger/deeper in the trenches and have superior numbers. This is yet to be seen. This is going to be a great game to attend and I commend 71st for scheduling up regardless of their record.
Good luck to both teams. I'll be listening to the statewide scores while I support my Rams.
Good luck to both teams. I'll be listening to the statewide scores while I support my Rams.
1) Fighting Scots should be undefeated; however, they've played one of the toughest schedules in the state to this point.
2) West Meck was a powerful opponent(sort of)
3) I think athletically the teams are very even with a great nod to Scotland
4) I commend 71st for scheduling up regardless of their record.
LOL
2) West Meck was a powerful opponent(sort of)
3) I think athletically the teams are very even with a great nod to Scotland
4) I commend 71st for scheduling up regardless of their record.
LOL
71st had no choice neither did sc this is a conference game. Zamir is the only difference between these teams IMO. You could change uniforms and you would hardly know the difference until you watched their style of play.
That is very possible because he is running with a purpose unlike anything I have seen from him. It is violent and he is downhill with no hesitation.
Well at least you want have to worry about taken your foot off the gas pedal you better hope you don't get blown out.
Last edited:
since jamboree I see homies say we stoping white. then in game white shut their mouth. trash talking gs
I will agree with that jmac, in the past not this year in all his greatness there has been a little timidness at certain times b4 hitting that hole or moving into some congestion. Definitely running with some purpose, our
Falcon conference foe will get a taste this Friday night.
Scotland is getting healthier by the week on the offensive line, hopefully in full force for the 1st time
this week.
71st doesnt have to stop Zamir, they have to beat Scotland. Big difference
Thanks for the 411 on 71st Mr. justdoit4! I'll keep and eye on that result on 10.13.17. I debated taking 71st at #1 for about 2 seconds, at the end of the day I don't think they would do any better than what West Meck did against The Fighting Scots. Now, if Scotland was blown out by West Meck it would have been a new discussion, but instead Scotland took it by storm.
As mentioned above, 71st and Scots should really be tied according to Mr. justdoit4, those two teams are mirror imagines of each other so he said.
I have a hard time ranking the 3-State Champ team over the current champion for the simple fact that Scotland has had solid wins since 2011; however, I totally understand the logic of waiting for Scotland vs 71st this Friday to let it work itself out. It's ashame that Scotland and Charlotte Catholics don't play this year.
As mentioned above, 71st and Scots should really be tied according to Mr. justdoit4, those two teams are mirror imagines of each other so he said.
I have a hard time ranking the 3-State Champ team over the current champion for the simple fact that Scotland has had solid wins since 2011; however, I totally understand the logic of waiting for Scotland vs 71st this Friday to let it work itself out. It's ashame that Scotland and Charlotte Catholics don't play this year.
Last edited:
You might want to check the roster big man. Seventy first aint small at all. stop jock riding
That is what these guys are failing to look at 71st is not fall and match up a whole lote better than most think
i no sweat jocks. bear say to me sf have big boys. i say big game friday. close but no cigar little g
since jamboree every one say match up a whole lot better than most think match up a whole lot better than most think match up a whole lot better than most think. then white prove wrong and make business boom in scotland.
Ben, you and Rebel One are both wrong. If we want to get back into the conference race for either first or second, we need for 71st to lose tonight and then we have to beat them as well. GO SCOTS!
@Ding Dong... what we need to do is beat both of them, but I hate to say it...we won't beat either... the way were playin now.
scots 35-21. half
A lot of offensive yards in this one
scots 320. first half
around 240. SF
A lot of offensive yards in this one
scots 320. first half
around 240. SF
Last edited:
Scots scored on 8 of 9 possessions, 1 int
I wont count the possession at the end taking knee
white just over 300 on 23 car
bell in the 290's ( is that right fay paper)
Wasn't 71st just allowing 9 points a game coming
in and the top defense rated in the league.
#21 is the real deal for 71st,
heck 2 or 3 guys made great catches for them
Last edited:
Put #6 at corner and lets get better in the secondary. Great throws by 71st and #21 is the best receiver I have seen since Cornell Powell but if our guys would just turn their heads and go after the ball they would make some of those plays.
Watched some of this last night. Scotland Oline was about as dominant as you can be against a good squad. Zamir was getting 6-7 yards untouched. That little speed option they run is tough to defend.
Scotland does have some issues at DB though. They seem to have athletes but just like in the MC game guys just running right by them with no jam and zero ball skills once the ball is in the air. There fortunate its a real down year for QB's
Scotland does have some issues at DB though. They seem to have athletes but just like in the MC game guys just running right by them with no jam and zero ball skills once the ball is in the air. There fortunate its a real down year for QB's
