This is a clear case of the punishment not fitting the crime and the dangers of passing a new rule without considering the potential for unintended consequences.
What would have happened had this occurred last season? Did the NCHSAA have a contingency plan for such a case?
The penalty for an ineligible player is a forfeit. Had this occurred during games 1-10, no big deal in Dudley's case, just a loss and a lower seed. Why should this happening in the last week of the season make the penalty much more punitive? I get it if the loss was the difference between Dudley making the playoffs and staying at home, but that is clearly not the case.
What is the intent of the Max Preps report the right record rule? I thought it was to make sure the association had correct records when seeding for the playoffs, not as a way to remove a team from the playoffs if something like this was discovered later. If that was the true hidden intent, I am not sure the new rule would have been approved.
It is the responsibility NCHSAA's "Professional" Staff to consider such issues and possible contingencies and advise the voting membership and executive committee on the consequences of new rules. If there continue to be embarrassing, "We didn't consider that" moments the operation of the association, then perhaps it is time to hire a Professional Staff.