Please consider this:
In each playoff bracket teams will be seeded by place in conference finish (1st, 2nd or 3rd depending on number of teams in conference) and then within that group by overall record. I have noticed several teams such as East Cateret, Avery and others, schedule tough nonconference opponents. this results in more losses which means a lower playoff seed and potential traveling in the 2nd or 3rd rounds as opposed to hosting playoff games.
Should a coach schedule to get better or schedule weaker opponents to get a better seed in the playoffs?
Should the state for seeding purposes only consider 1A games and not punish teams playing up one or more divisions? I favor this approach. Should East, Prep or Avery receive a lower seed for playing 3A or higher teams? I think not, seeds should only be based on playing 1A teams. With this teams are free to schedule who they want to develop their teams without running the risk of getting a lower seed as the result. You could even stipulate that teams must play at least 10 games vs 1A teams, most if not all do this.
What are your feelings on the subject?
In each playoff bracket teams will be seeded by place in conference finish (1st, 2nd or 3rd depending on number of teams in conference) and then within that group by overall record. I have noticed several teams such as East Cateret, Avery and others, schedule tough nonconference opponents. this results in more losses which means a lower playoff seed and potential traveling in the 2nd or 3rd rounds as opposed to hosting playoff games.
Should a coach schedule to get better or schedule weaker opponents to get a better seed in the playoffs?
Should the state for seeding purposes only consider 1A games and not punish teams playing up one or more divisions? I favor this approach. Should East, Prep or Avery receive a lower seed for playing 3A or higher teams? I think not, seeds should only be based on playing 1A teams. With this teams are free to schedule who they want to develop their teams without running the risk of getting a lower seed as the result. You could even stipulate that teams must play at least 10 games vs 1A teams, most if not all do this.
What are your feelings on the subject?