As far as apple’s to apple’s, I’m not sure I understand. If you want to compare divisions of play, that opens a can of worms.
Pender @ Wallace- Rose Hill
- Thread starter dogs79
- Start date
Comparing Marino to Brady is apples to apples because it's the same level of play. People argue Jordan vs Lebron and use titles as a difference. That makes sense because it's the same level of play. Comparing 1A vs 2A are different levels of play. I had the privilege of coaching Andrew and have known Dawan since he was in diapers. We even stood together at the WRH/Clinton game a couple of weeks ago. I love Dawan, but Andrew Bowden was a phenomenal qb.
I respect your opinion. You have grounds to stand on and so do I. You were the one that compared different classifications.
I have to agree with DB22 here. Bowden was a much better qb than Dawan and honestly it’s not even close. The 04 and 05 runner up teams were absolutely loaded for sure but Bowden was a WRH qb that was a true threat to pass the ball and not just hand it off every time. I’m really appreciative of Dawan and his titles but as a qb he had some bad mechanics and threw a lot of crap up for grabs.
As far as comparing apples to apples you would have to compare Marino to Eli Manning (2 titles) and not Brady. There is hardly anyone that would say Eli was a better qb than Marino.
As far as comparing apples to apples you would have to compare Marino to Eli Manning (2 titles) and not Brady. There is hardly anyone that would say Eli was a better qb than Marino.
Got a lot of positives with both. Dawan did throw the ball well his jr and sr year.
What did I tell you during the playoffs last year? LOL
If I remember correctly Bowden had 25 td passes to only 2 ints his senior year.
Both played 1a ball and basically the same people during the Regular seasons. Thomasville was loaded but the body of work for Dawan after a coaching change was pretty big.
Similar threads
