Originally posted by dtfix:
Originally posted by btango:
I supported Dudley but my reasoning was not if they had forfeited other games or not but I do not like the penalty. I think teams should not be forfeiting games for breaking the 8 quarter rule, or X amount of players leaving the bench during a fight, or being ejected et al.
I prefer to see a system that has tiered penalties...
Fighting / ejections would cause the players involved to be suspended for multiple games but not go against the team.
The answer for why we have expanded playoffs is "to allow more student/athletes to participate". Well, let them participate instead of booting them out of the playoffs.
This post was edited on 11/26 2:26 PM by btango
Tango - We need to have you in the role of NCHSAA commissioner... or at least the title of "Consultant to the Board of Directors" Currently, there is something not quite right with the Association. I'm not saying that they are the evil empire that many accuse them of being as the the good far outweighs the bad. It seems though that policy decisions aren't always thought through before being implemented. I know the membership votes on policy, but it seems like there is a lack of "if we implement this, here are possible consequences" discussion going on.
Case in point... football playoff qualification and seeding has become so convoluted that it now takes multiple attempts for the seeding to be correct on selection Saturday.
My favorite... if a forfeit results in a seeding chance after the playoffs have been set you're out. Nice to know your playoff fate can be decided by the luck of the draw... or lack there of.
Is it time to rethink the governance structure, or is it time for some long-time staff to retire or both?