Blue and gold, if you don't mind me asking. Who are the others that you are referring to.
Clock operators on the last drive twice never started the clock on Dillon offensive plays. The very first play of the drive and then the one after the pass interference called on #10.
At least 3 times in that final 4 minutes the chain gang flipped the down marker back when Dillon has ball inside the 7 . Once resulting in an additional play. The 2nd time the side judge caught it.
Mallard Creek had a 3 down series late because either the official or the chain gang made it third down rather than 2nd after a penalty call.
I hate to make this game about all that and trust me when I say none of that stuff occurred in 2013 but this was strange from the get go and got really out of control the last 5 minutes. Its not the first place I have been to where this stuff occurs but it was the most blatant I can remember. Was it dishonest??? Lets just say it was either unethical or extreme incompetence .
We don't care about national rankings blue, we only chasing rings in Dillon. We would love to play them big boys of SC. I doubt it will ever happen.
We don't care about national rankings blue, we only chasing rings in Dillon. We would love to play them big boys of SC. I doubt it will ever happen.
Thought the penalties on MC D kept most drives alive for Dillon. Dillon also made some plays but their offense was not electric by any measure.
Note MC had two punts of less than 15 yards in critical field position.
MC also had some defensive drops.
On the catch I think you are citing the receiver was out of bounds. There were a lot flags and only remember one being waved off.
MC played at times like they looked, ragged and somewhat confused. Gold, red, yellow, lime, and green cleats to go with black and white plus multiple colors of gloves, socks, and spats. Call me old fashion but it looks terrible. Does that signify a lot of individuals? Once again saw a stupid personal foul penalty on MC player cost them huge. Was glad to see the HC dig in his butt.
Thought the penalties on MC D kept most drives alive for Dillon. Dillon also made some plays but their offense was not electric by any measure.
Note MC had two punts of less than 15 yards in critical field position.
MC also had some defensive drops.
On the catch I think you are citing the receiver was out of bounds. There were a lot flags and only remember one being waved off.
MC played at times like they looked, ragged and somewhat confused. Gold, red, yellow, lime, and green cleats to go with black and white plus multiple colors of gloves, socks, and spats. Call me old fashion but it looks terrible. Does that signify a lot of individuals? Once again saw a stupid personal foul penalty on MC player cost them huge. Was glad to see the HC dig in his butt.
I may have gotten some wrong info, but I was told it was a two year deal. One in Dillon and one at the creek.
I didn't see the illegal shift on that play with Johnny Allen Either. Not to mention that our operations had our head coach mixed up. He thought it was 1st down when it was really 4th.
Mallard Creek only had 44 yards of TOTAL offense in the second half. I need someone to please explain away this stat line. The refs have nothing to do with that stat . That is called Dillon Defensive Domination. OUR Defensive front 7 Actually dominated those guys mostly every play.
MC you are an embarrassment to NC football and all you have proven is how weak NC 4A football really is.
All your references to other classifications as weak compared to 4A just lost all credibility.
Be glad you are where you are.
You would not be a three-peat champ in a lower classification.
This is priceless. 7-3.
Now try and run your mouth with your excuses.
Avery McCall would have killed you.
Nice duck job to get a first year QB instead of a Shrine Bowl MVP.
Bad snap on the 2 !?
Muffed punt at Dillon 35 !?
How much help did you need to beat a 2A team by 4 ??
In high school football there is no automatic first down administered on most penalties. I think only the roughing penalties now carry the automatic first down. The play at the goal line that resulted in the much questioned fourth down was defensive holding it appeared. The ball was thrown toward the back near the line of scrimmage. The flag was thrown on the defender covering in the end zone near the sideline. Half the distance to the goal line and replay the down. If the ball is placed beyond the first down marker due to the penalty mark off it is obviously a first down but it is not automatically a first down. I watched the chain crew discussing while the replay of the fourth down was being set up and they were changing the down marker but the ref was not instructing them to do so at that time.
They had it marked as 4th down before the snap and switched it to 1st during play.
Good PostIn my opinion from a football prospective, a good defense almost always beats a good offense early in the season. One of the main reasons for this is it usually takes those big o-linemen several games to get into game shape and find their cohesion as a group. It doesn't matter if it is five d-1 linemen or zero, the big guys need time to get into game shape. Once the big guys on the o-line find their groove than you will see the whole offense click and become more consistent overall. Because of this early in the season good defensive front sevens make it difficult on good offenses to run the ball effectively. It sounds like that is what happened in this game on both sides.
On a second note from a coaching prospective, if I coached a really good program that wasn't as hyped as MC especially a loaded program outside the Charlotte area in a community that really supported my program, I would love to play the Creek in week zero of the season for several reasons. The first reason is from a coaching prospective you can use the upcoming Creek game as off season motivation for the whole year whether that's in the weight room or field. Every time someone doesn't work to get better you can remind them of MC coming to town to embarrass them in front of their family and friends. Secondly MC in week zero will not be the same team as MC in week eight, week eight MC will be a wrecking ball of a team. Third you can completely focus on and analyze one of the top teams in the country which will make you better while MC isn't focused on you so much. MC coaches may know better but their players will look at the game as just another game. Last the hype of a MC coming to town will generate tremendous support including financial for the program. Just my humble prospective.
Well we don't need the creek for motivation, we do this in Dillon no matter who we playing. We train year around in the weight room to win state championships, that's our motivation. Not week zero.
In my opinion from a football prospective, a good defense almost always beats a good offense early in the season. One of the main reasons for this is it usually takes those big o-linemen several games to get into game shape and find their cohesion as a group. It doesn't matter if it is five d-1 linemen or zero, the big guys need time to get into game shape. Once the big guys on the o-line find their groove than you will see the whole offense click and become more consistent overall. Because of this early in the season good defensive front sevens make it difficult on good offenses to run the ball effectively. It sounds like that is what happened in this game on both sides.
On a second note from a coaching prospective, if I coached a really good program that wasn't as hyped as MC especially a loaded program outside the Charlotte area in a community that really supported my program, I would love to play the Creek in week zero of the season for several reasons. The first reason is from a coaching prospective you can use the upcoming Creek game as off season motivation for the whole year whether that's in the weight room or field. Every time someone doesn't work to get better you can remind them of MC coming to town to embarrass them in front of their family and friends. Secondly MC in week zero will not be the same team as MC in week eight, week eight MC will be a wrecking ball of a team. Third you can completely focus on and analyze one of the top teams in the country which will make you better while MC isn't focused on you so much. MC coaches may know better but their players will look at the game as just another game. Last the hype of a MC coming to town will generate tremendous support including financial for the program. Just my humble prospective.
You obviously missed the point of the post that I made...Well we don't need the creek for motivation, we do this in Dillon no matter who we playing. We train year around in the weight room to win state championships, that's our motivation. Not week zero.
They had it marked as 4th down before the snap and switched it to 1st during play.
There is no doubt that there may have been some confusion, hell I was confused with the way it was officiated. I honestly don't think it was meant on purpose to screw over Mallard Creek. Mallard Creek wasn't robbed of a TD like Dillon was due to sorry refs, now THAT was a game changer. The issue with first down fourth down was eventually corrected.
Good post and your right about a ton of stuff except trust me Dillon has been on MC's mind all summer. SC schools do have a advantage in week zero because they get full contact in spring and earlier than NC .
The reason this game gets played is MC is looking for a tough gut check game on the road week 1. Dillon is just what the doctor ordered.
I agree with you that Dillon has been on MC's mind all summer and that it is a good opening game for MC to get ready for the season. The difference is in these type of communities with these type of games, MC has been on Dillon's mind all YEAR or however long the game was scheduled, that's the difference. I can almost guarantee that many of Dillon's players were reminded of the MC game every time they stopped by the barbershops, out to eat, church, etc by family, fans, and ex-players. I've lived in Charlotte and in a small town community where football is huge. There is a difference. I lived in Matthews when Butler had it rolling pretty good and there were several Butler kids with d-1 offers that I would talk football with every Saturday morning in the barbershop and no one else really showed much interest and how those guys or their team were doing football wise. A barbershop in a football town is all together a different beast for players and coaches lol. Also let me add for the purpose of some on this thread, a win is a win. Congrats Mavericks.Good post and your right about a ton of stuff except trust me Dillon has been on MC's mind all summer. SC schools do have a advantage in week zero because they get full contact in spring and earlier than NC .
The reason this game gets played is MC is looking for a tough gut check game on the road week 1. Dillon is just what the doctor ordered.
I am not a MC fan. I like great high school football and follow teams in both Carolinas pretty closely, some more closely than others. Dillon has a great program and I was aware of that well before MC existed. I can remember when you guys and Pageland were going at it back in the day. I have the almost respect for Dillon, Fairfield Central, etc. out of SC and teams like Shelby, Monroe, etc. out of NC. Smaller schools who I think can play with anybody most years. I think it is a shame that the big SC schools cannot or will not play you guys. Good luck the rest of the year.What I'm saying is we do the weight room year around and not for the creek. Of course,we was pump up to play you guys. That's common sense. Dillon has been going hard for years and our motivation is rings.
This is what Mallard Creek fans on this site do when they boast about being big, deep, D1 laden and then only score 7 points on a school one third their attendence. Same guys, same bullshit.It appears that Mallard Creek supporters feel the need to defend their 4 point win over Dillon more than Dillon supported do. Yes I was at the game. Mallard Creek has athletes all over the field. Facts are simply this... Dillon game them all they wanted while playing a defensive end at quarterback!
It appears that Mallard Creek supporters feel the need to defend their 4 point win over Dillon more than Dillon supporters do. Yes I was at the game. Mallard Creek has athletes all over the field. Facts are simply this... Dillon game them all they wanted while playing a defensive end at quarterback!
Btango, you are correct, only the roughing penalties carry automatic first down. You are also correct in if the play started on the 6 and they had defensive holding, it should be next snapped from the 3 and repeat 4th down.In high school football there is no automatic first down administered on most penalties. I think only the roughing penalties now carry the automatic first down. The play at the goal line that resulted in the much questioned fourth down was defensive holding it appeared. The ball was thrown toward the back near the line of scrimmage. The flag was thrown on the defender covering in the end zone near the sideline. Half the distance to the goal line and replay the down. If the ball is placed beyond the first down marker due to the penalty mark off it is obviously a first down but it is not automatically a first down. I watched the chain crew discussing while the replay of the fourth down was being set up and they were changing the down marker but the ref was not instructing them to do so at that time.