Who you got - Watauga at Burns
- Thread starter NC Joker
- Start date
Supposedly Burns is going to "out athlete" Watauga, whatever that means. It just sounds stupid.
Touchdown called back for holding.
Dogs go for it on 4th down. Bad spot gives it to Watauga.
Dogs go for it on 4th down. Bad spot gives it to Watauga.
let em go at it on the track. Watauaga would run the tables. Good test of out athlete
Lol really? Now those unathletic pioneers are overpowering and out running the dogs, you gonna turn to the officials for blame?
FUMBLE!!!! Dogs recover and score. TD negated for hold during run back. Dogs keep possession. 12 seconds to go.
Habich is an amazing coach, especially when it comes to game planning against "more athletic" teams.
If you're referring to me, I never said Burns would win the game because we had more athletes and I said I'm worried about this game. Burns does have more athletes than Watauga. If you're watching the game it's obvious. That doesn't mean that we win the game. This is a good competitive game.
Looks like the game is tied, so I will disagree that burns has more athletes. What exactly is your definition of athlete, because those comments are starting to seem a tad bit racist.
We got a liberal here fellas...... I'm not going there dude. And for you to insinuate that is pretty low.
They are very well coached, very disciplined, and ain't skeered
Touchdown Burns.
2 pt conversion good
35 - 28
8:39 to go.
2 pt conversion good
35 - 28
8:39 to go.
My definition of athlete is 42 to 28 at the moment Brandon.
Yes they had back to back fumbles. That's how Burns turned 21-28 to 42-28. But Wataga is worn out.
Option QB who is basically running on each offensive snap is also playing dB on defense - also running every play. Slap worn out.
Back to back fumbles giving up a short field to Burns will do that.
Again...was looking for an actual answer not a Confucius quote.
Similar threads
