Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Football pays for a lot of sports. Football does not make the money that many think. One thing I think they missed is that often the concessions can do well at games but with less people, less profit there, also.
Catch 22. Travel, lack of gates especially in early rounds, playing conference opponents early rounds, playing different teams. Teams that do not realisitically have a chance to win a playoff game.
Is this another reason to look at lowering the number of playoff participants? 256 to 192 is a great start. Six state titles from eight. Another reason not to add to the non football playoffs, stay at four classes.
I definitely feel the NCHSAA should only get the $1.00/ticket and not the 15% of the gate unless they share in the overhead to put the game on, lights and officials at least.
Maybe lower the cut of the gate to 25% for the visiting teams. I truly believe it would be a motivator to be a better team and more affordable in hosting playoff games.
There is no way that a school isn't making money at a football game... there is no way.
Great post as usual . I agree and have said many times we should have a 1A-6A instead of this 1A 1AA thru 4A 4AA 8 championships .It's really disgraceful that a team is losing money playing for a state title...It's a reward for sure for the team but not the atheletic program as a whole if that's the case...
What happens if the NCHSAA is taken out of the picture altogether for the title games, and let the home team host the championships, and keep all the gate receipts, and pay the visitor out of that money?....Rotate the championships from East to West as used to be the case....I wonder how the old system compares with today's 4 venues for the championships?....I don't ever remember teams losing money back then as compared to today?....Teams playing for a championship of any kind should not be losing money....PERIOD!
Without the schools, there would be no need for the NCHSAA, so the schools are the ones that need to be making a profit and not the NCHSAA and their endless staff and endowments that needs to be paid....
Today's High School Football fan is unllike the Football fan of the past who would travel all over the state to watch his/her favorite team play, and maybe that IS because there are just too many playoff games, consisting of teams that shouldn't be in the playoffs in the first place, meaning the playoff field should be cut down to 32 teams for each championship with 1A-6A being the classes....I've thought since 2001, that 8 champions was too many, and was a watered-down format....The fact that teams are losing money makes me believe that even more today...
I agree that there needs to be something done about this situation because Football as pointed out above is the money maker for a school's entire atheletic program, and the Coaches and the NCHSAA need to figure out a way where it is going to be profitable for a school to make the playoffs....Otherwise, what is the benefit to the school if their claim to a successful season results in the school actually losing money....How can that be deemed successful if that's the case?
Great post as usual . I agree and have said many times we should have a 1A-6A instead of this 1A 1AA thru 4A 4AA 8 championships .
It's really disgraceful that a team is losing money playing for a state title...It's a reward for sure for the team but not the atheletic program as a whole if that's the case...
What happens if the NCHSAA is taken out of the picture altogether for the title games, and let the home team host the championships, and keep all the gate receipts, and pay the visitor out of that money?....Rotate the championships from East to West as used to be the case....I wonder how the old system compares with today's 4 venues for the championships?....I don't ever remember teams losing money back then as compared to today?....Teams playing for a championship of any kind should not be losing money....PERIOD!
Without the schools, there would be no need for the NCHSAA, so the schools are the ones that need to be making a profit and not the NCHSAA and their endless staff and endowments that need to be paid....
1A-6A is what I now support as well - 192 playoff teams or even less would be ok with me. Too many teams with losing records getting in now.
If you are a high school football coach and someone made this proposal: "you can win a state title 300 miles from home and make zero dollars or you can lose at home and net $10,000 for the program" which do you think he is going to choose? I believe overwhelmingly they are going for a title. I know the players want the ring.
I do not like the big college stadiums but I want the centralized title games. I attended three title games under the home team format including the one that is noted as causing the NCHSAA to start looking at moving the games to the college stadiums. I want the title game to be as fair as possible to both teams. I am more concerned about the players "experience" than I am the fans although I want the fans to be taken care of also. I have heard the roar to play the game at one of the schools and how great it would be. I also know the logistical issues and the other things that can make it a catastrophe for the visitors. The geography of NC makes it tough especially for the very far western teams.
Rick, I agree with most of your remarks, especially about the size of the NCHSAA. Interested in your take on a couple issues.btango, I've always liked your idea of 5 rounds for the 1A schools, but I still think that the championship games should be played at the home venues of the teams rotating from East to West....It should be a reward for the teams, the fans and the local businesses to be able to host a state title game in their area....As you mentioned, I have NO problem with the 2A-4A games being located centrally because most of those schools are located more toward the center of the state than are the 1A schools that are mostly located along the western and eastern edges of the state with the exception of the YVC which is pretty much centrally located....I like the idea of changing to a 1A-6A Class format with the biggest and smallest classes awarding only 32 teams a playoff spot, but the central location for 1A schools cost both the home and visitors money, and the fans have to spend an inordinate amount of money as well to attend these games due to the extended travel....If the games were rotated from year to year as used to be the case, one school would at least make some money whether they won the title or not, and I think it could also be worked out where the visitor could make some money as well if the ENTIRE gate receipts for the championship games went to the hosting school for the championship....I know that security has always been used as an excuse for the reason why this setup doesn't happen, but I'm not buying that issue for the 1A schools, and think the local law enforcement could, and likely would be willing to take on that task because a lot of those policeman/deputies would likely have friends or even relatives playing for the local teams of the smaller schools in their area of enforcement...
I just think the NCHSAA has gotten too big, and the staff needs to be reduced instead of expanded which of course cost all the schools more money due to salaries and benefits for that expanded staff....I wasn't sure that I would like the new format that got Maxpreps involved, but I think that it might be a good concept moving forward with the ranking of the teams, and I also think that it now opens the door to a new idea of locating schools of different classes in the same conference because those smaller schools would NO longer be penalized come playoff time if their conference is strong...
The expanded playoff format that began back in 2001 has offered more job security for coaches because they can rightfully claim that their teams made the playoffs essentially every year...That changed somewhat this year with the format of inviting only 48 teams, but there are still too many 1A teams qualifying for the playoffs IMO, and I believe this is still a factor in the first round games which leads to smaller gate receipts for the team that is hosting....And the BYES are costing the higher seeded teams money in the first round which is also not a good idea....
Making the playoffs should be a reward for a great season, and teams with losing records have no business making the playoffs IMO, and should not be rewarded as such....My opinion of that will never change even if it means that my Rosman Tigers only make the playoffs once in a blue moon...
Fans today are not the fans of our fathers and grandfathers because there are so many more options for today's young people, and the attention span of today's generation is a lot shorter than year's past...In other words, people/fans are not going to attend playoff games where they generally already know what the outcome will be when a team with a losing record meets one of the higher seeded teams, so they will generally stay at home for those games, and attend a more compelling game the next round or two..I think that is part of the problem, and that problem can be solved possibilly if the playoff field is reduced to qualify only 32 deserving teams with the championship site located at the school and NOT a centralized location in the middle of the state which is in most cases 100's of miles from both the home and visitors fanbase....
Just my two cents....
1A sports is on its own island...the Supers and Principals really need to get together and straighten this out....it seems like every year it’s something else and that’s when a fresh set of eyes and minds need to look at this...leave NCHSAA out of it....it’s over their heads
Rick, I agree with most of your remarks, especially about the size of the NCHSAA. Interested in your take on a couple issues.
Do you agree that, with everything else being equal, a team that has to travel 7-8 hours one way is at a competitive disadvantage? If so, picture this hypothetical, but current example:
Suppose this is the year for the east to host the championship.
Suppose that Pamlico (9-4) pulls the upsets and represents the east.
Suppose Cherokee (11-1) wins the west.
Cherokee would travel almost 8 hours one way to play for a state championship, simply because it is the east’s turn to host.
There are many fans who can’t take time from work, pay to travel and pay for a hotel room, even for a state championship. But they could justify a 3-4 hour trip to the center of the state and return home the same day.
More importantly, is it fair to the kids who have excelled all year long, but are put a tremendous disadvantage due to geography and the luck of the draw?
I remember the Thomasville-Eastern Randolph game in 1983. About 30 minutes from my home, but I knew the game was big for both teams and their fanbases. I arrived about three hours before game time, only to find that the best I could do was a blanket on the ground, five yards deep into the end zone. Reportedly, it was a great game, but I only saw the part of it that took place inside the thirty yard line on my end. The game could easily have been moved to Simeon Stadium in High Point, neutral and close for both schools. Granted, these teams were 3-A, but the same concern applies to all classifications in stadiums that can’t support a state championship crowd and are a great distance for one school.
In short, I hope we never return to that old formula, but interested in your thoughts.
I think the problem with that solution is finding a place with less than a week's notice. Few venues would reserve a date without an assurance much further in advance.While I agree with most of these post I do feel it's an unfair advantage to do an easy/west state championship game at one of the two teams playing. At that stage of the playoffs there are only 16 teams playing in all 4 brackets. Therefore it seems to me that somewhere approximately halfway between the two teams playing there would be a neuteral high school site large enough to hold all fans coming from both schools. Monitary concerns would be shared equally between both schools after paying the expenses of security, lighting extera. Also, the concessions could be given to the school where the game is being held. Finally as stated above my biggest concern is to take away the home field advantage from both schools. This would elemiate any unfair advantage to either school..
Badtiger
I think the problem with that solution is finding a place with less than a week's notice. Few venues would reserve a date without an assurance much further in advance.
Western Carolina and East Carolina are both too far to the west and east, Western more so, fir title games.
Campbell holds 5,500 but 75% or more of that is on the home side. Not really an overflow area like a hill. Great facility with turf. Pembroke is smaller, about 4,000 seats. It is also on the state line which is not very centrally located.
LR would be an excellent venue if they rotated the 1A title games between a Mid East and Mid West location. It holds over 8,000. Not sure what would be a strong potential Mid East location.
A&T does not appear to be interested, same as some other schools, because of potential playoff scheduling issues and field maintenance. Some colleges with grass fields do not want the field used after they finish their season. Do not see why two weeks and a few games would matter.
Grimsley holds 10k. That would be a bit tight for 4A games. Not sure if seating people on the grass is a great option in December but that is additional space. There have been some 4A games at Wake where fans were allowed to go into the upper sections. Triad would need to be Wake or A&T.