For the IDIOTS out there that want to blame luke on the fumbles how about the running backs that could not hold on to the ball!! luke made 2 mistakes out there..
.....like I said...that was a collective effort....just had one of those games...it happens....Originally posted by RAIDERS2014:
Yes the refs did a good job! Running backs fumbling the ball don't get you a win!! We were lucky to lose by only 1 point!
Whatever it was I bet it was higher than the F the raiders put up tonight.Originally posted by swett2victory:
Was there any Magical thinking in this game?
What Grade did the Ref's receive tonight?
a. A
b. B
c. C
d. D
e. None of the above
...lol...I guess a 7 turnover night gets you an "F"....Originally posted by Scots9000:
Whatever it was I bet it was higher than the F the raiders put up tonight.Originally posted by swett2victory:
Was there any Magical thinking in this game?
What Grade did the Ref's receive tonight?
a. A
b. B
c. C
d. D
e. None of the above
WERE U AT THE GAME..D33Originally posted by dcov33:
@Raiders2014 yes they did fumble but luke had more than 2, a bad handoff from the QB can cause a fumble a bad pitch from the QB can cause a fumble .LUKE is not a Triple option QB he is a good QB but that system did not work in his favor THIS YEAR ..
....many of the players didn't cash there game checks.....ripped them up in disgust after the game tonight!Originally posted by swett2victory:
Did the booster club not meet their pay out standards?
I bet the player's got payed less this year and more money was spent on the hearters which in turn did not work.
Originally posted by raiderLAW:
....many of the players didn't cash there game checks.....ripped them up in disgust after the game tonight!Originally posted by swett2victory:
Did the booster club not meet their pay out standards?
I bet the player's got payed less this year and more money was spent on the hearters which in turn did not work.
I counted 8 turnovers. 7 fumbles lost (out of 12 total; 1 was a muffed punt) and 1 int. And still only lost by 1. If the Raiders hang on to the ball they win by 20 or more.Originally posted by raiderLAW:
...the ref's did fine.....7 turnovers....not much else needs to be said.....
fair enough...I lost count.....Originally posted by 1Twister:
I counted 8 turnovers. 7 fumbles lost (out of 12 total; 1 was a muffed punt) and 1 int. And still only lost by 1. If the Raiders hang on to the ball they win by 20 or more.Originally posted by raiderLAW:
...the ref's did fine.....7 turnovers....not much else needs to be said.....
Oh well, 11-2 isn't terrible. Good season and frankly much better than was anticipated by many folks before the season began.
That's true. RC wasn't on anyone's radar or ranked at the beginning of the season. As tough as any loss is at RC this team had a great season. A lot of talent coming up too. Future is bright.Originally posted by 1Twister:
I counted 8 turnovers. 7 fumbles lost (out of 12 total; 1 was a muffed punt) and 1 int. And still only lost by 1. If the Raiders hang on to the ball they win by 20 or more.Originally posted by raiderLAW:
...the ref's did fine.....7 turnovers....not much else needs to be said.....
Oh well, 11-2 isn't terrible. Good season and frankly much better than was anticipated by many folks before the season began.
...please elaborate...what do you think was "embarrassing"?Originally posted by FUN N' GUN:
Another early exit from the playoffs.. Defense played good enough to win. Offense was sloppy,too many fumbles to count,a pathetic pass attempt that was intercepted.. A QB not quick enough to run the option but stayed in the game after the JV QB played a series and led them to a score. To be honest it was embarrassing!
Seriously- 12 fumbles??Originally posted by 1Twister:
I counted 8 turnovers. 7 fumbles lost (out of 12 total; 1 was a muffed punt) and 1 int. And still only lost by 1. If the Raiders hang on to the ball they win by 20 or more.Originally posted by raiderLAW:
...the ref's did fine.....7 turnovers....not much else needs to be said.....
Oh well, 11-2 isn't terrible. Good season and frankly much better than was anticipated by many folks before the season began.
.........if close to 400 yards of total offense is embarrassing then I will be embarrassed every week.....question for you......football IQ test.....did Richmond's offense work tonight?Originally posted by FUN N' GUN:
The way the offense played! We're you not watching the same game everyone else saw?
......yep.....seriously!!.....it was a group effort!....Originally posted by Blue and Gold22:
Seriously- 12 fumbles??Originally posted by 1Twister:
I counted 8 turnovers. 7 fumbles lost (out of 12 total; 1 was a muffed punt) and 1 int. And still only lost by 1. If the Raiders hang on to the ball they win by 20 or more.Originally posted by raiderLAW:
...the ref's did fine.....7 turnovers....not much else needs to be said.....
Oh well, 11-2 isn't terrible. Good season and frankly much better than was anticipated by many folks before the season began.
really?....the offense was executed.....as it has been all year....just layed the ball on the ground.....when that happens it really doesnt matter what O you run.....you normally lose....Originally posted by FUN N' GUN:
Ok then.. 400 yards total offense and 12 fumbles. Ask me again about the execution of the offense and say I'm all for it...
paidOriginally posted by swett2victory:
Did the booster club not meet their pay out standards?
I bet the player's got payed less this year and more money was spent on the hearters which in turn did not work.
...you finally read my post and now get it!Originally posted by dcov33:
THE OFFENSE DID PRETTY GOOD BUT WE COULD NOT HOLD ON TO THE BALL .@RAIDERLAW MAN GET OUT OF THE TWILIGHT ZONE
The Raiders lost their magic. Are you happy S2V?Originally posted by swett2victory:
WHY ARE YOU'LL NOT USING THE MAGIC WORD
It seems like that is the GOLDEN standard now......Originally posted by raiderman2001:
Didn't see any heaters on Millbrooks sideline.... Guess raider fans should be happy with second place in the conference and a second rd playoff loss....