I've read the other thread that was discussing this. To clear it up, they should change the AND/OR to just OR. Right now, with it written as AND/OR, if a team meets either requirement (.500 or top 3) they should be seeded as a #1.
Maybe it is just because I am analytical and on a daily bases have to go off of what clients requirements are, but if someone gives me a requirement of AND/OR I'm going to say if this team is .500 OR top 3, they get seeded with #1's.
Lets take the Shelby/TJ conference (as that is the one discussed) and think about TJ & Cherryville. Even if they have a decent team, every year they will have to compete with Shelby, Burns, East Gaston. Three 2A teams. Is it fair for a 1A to have to beat a 2A team in order to be seeded with the other conference finishers? So I think the NCHSAA said that if they are .500 OR top 3 (because if you are both, you still meet the criteria as OR). So now if TJ beats Cherryville, Bessemer City & Highland Tech they can be seeded as a #1.