Okay...I've taken the weekend and a few days to look over the 5A class system more...either you try to split for more favorable ADM gaps - or you try to split for more even teams. The general consensus I get from everyone here is you'd rather see more even teams and we'll live with the ADM gaps.
Give or take...the numbers don't move too much...but definitely makes for a better playoff field. I like the way the splitting for teams looks.
This is what I got:
Realignment Data Review Post
It'll take a hot minute, but I'll run a side by side comparison to our current 4A system in place so we can see how that looks. In the meantime I'll post the classes - Conferences - Playoffs - some housekeeping rules.
Give or take...the numbers don't move too much...but definitely makes for a better playoff field. I like the way the splitting for teams looks.
This is what I got:
Realignment Data Review Post
SPLIT | CLASS | TEAMS | ADM | ADM GAP | PO TEAMS |
19% | 5A | 70 | 1684--3688 | 2004 | 48 |
21% | 4A | 78 | 1155--1673 | 518 | 48 |
21% | 3A | 78 | 861--1153 | 292 | 48 |
21% | 2A | 78 | 622--860 | 238 | 48 |
19% | 1A | 70 | 152--614 | 462 | 48 |
It'll take a hot minute, but I'll run a side by side comparison to our current 4A system in place so we can see how that looks. In the meantime I'll post the classes - Conferences - Playoffs - some housekeeping rules.