Seeding question
- Thread starter fatherof3
- Start date
you take the conf 1's, then seed those by
their maxprep number.
Richmond 7-4 wil host N Meck 8-3.
Rich finished higher in their respective conference was the decider here. (2)
If they both finish 2nd then the better MP # would be the better seed.
Rich slightly higher there also.
Teams rewarded for how good they are not if they played a weak schedule and have
a better win %%
their maxprep number.
Richmond 7-4 wil host N Meck 8-3.
Rich finished higher in their respective conference was the decider here. (2)
If they both finish 2nd then the better MP # would be the better seed.
Rich slightly higher there also.
Teams rewarded for how good they are not if they played a weak schedule and have
a better win %%
Last edited:
PC was further East. Their seeding was based on teams out of the Eastern Bracket. I believe?
They were in a split conference. I believe the only 4A team in the conference. So they are listed as winners every year....Which is stupid!
They beat McDowell which was the other 4A team in the split conference. So they were the best of 2 teams.....LOL!
Scarier part is if McDowell had won Friday, they would have been the representative and would have never beat a 4A team! Let that sink in.
Thats what i said. I would rather forfeit than accept that. There has to be abetter way... jmo
McDowell was in the same situation during 2013 playoff's. They decided to forfeit.
fix the split conference thing and we have a system that's fine, or maybe at large everything after the
conference champs, you cant at large the entire field
it takes away from conference winning,
the bigger side of a split conf should not get the
benefit of the split conf rule.
conference champs, you cant at large the entire field
it takes away from conference winning,
the bigger side of a split conf should not get the
benefit of the split conf rule.
That's the fix. Smaller classification of a split is a conference champion by being the highest finisher in the conference from their classification. Large classification highest finisher must win the overall conference to be a one seed.
I think only conference champions should be an automatic qualifier. I also believe that the schools schools all be seeded by power ranking. Winning an inferior conference with a bad overall record should not place that conference champion over a team that has one loss to a great conference opponent in a loaded conference.
Similar threads
