Same thing was said last year. MC has definitely improved for sure. Should be a good one.Tough game for Watauga
They showed it earlier in the year in Ohio against Archbishop Moeller who is 12-1 after their playoff win last night.I guess MC is better than last year, but I think even Nepsy might agree that they have the players to be a lot better than they showed last night. They were simply superior to LN, and it seemed like at times they were happy to just toy with them. I felt that If they had tightened up and gone hard after every point like the needed it, they could have completely destroyed LN.
I'm no expert on MC, but I believe they have potential they have not yet shown.
The same thing was said about their ability to show up last season as well. Nothing but respect foe MC, I'm just saying this was the exact same conversation as last season.I guess MC is better than last year, but I think even Nepsy might agree that they have the players to be a lot better than they showed last night. They were simply superior to LN, and it seemed like at times they were happy to just toy with them. I felt that If they had tightened up and gone hard after every point like the needed it, they could have completely destroyed LN.
I'm no expert on MC, but I believe they have potential they have not yet shown.
That's true, and I think Moeller has a better than even shot at winning their championship.They showed it earlier in the year in Ohio against Archbishop Moeller who is 12-1 after their playoff win last night.
One of the passes was straight to a wide open defender in the end zone. I guess the coach decided he didn't need any more of that.Wautaga has lost 3 games in 3 years and while the competition is a notch down they are well coached with a very good QB who killed them with his feet LY. They won't find him sitting in the pocket like they found that kid last night.
That said...maybe MC found the recipe for success last night. No more bubble screens and buck sweeps. Two very good QBs and #3 between the tackles 25-30 times. Take away a few holding penalties and they rush for 400+ yards and score 50 last night. Threw 2 passes.
Sometimes simple is better.
I hope to see a Hough.Mallard Creek rematchI guess MC is better than last year, but I think even Nepsy might agree that they have the players to be a lot better than they showed last night. They were simply superior to LN, and it seemed like at times they were happy to just toy with them. I felt that If they had tightened up and gone hard after every point like the needed it, they could have completely destroyed LN.
I'm no expert on MC, but I believe they have potential they have not yet shown.
Boy, how many times have I seen the bubble screens and buck sweeps, and it not work.Wautaga has lost 3 games in 3 years and while the competition is a notch down they are well coached with a very good QB who killed them with his feet LY. They won't find him sitting in the pocket like they found that kid last night.
That said...maybe MC found the recipe for success last night. No more bubble screens and buck sweeps. Two very good QBs and #3 between the tackles 25-30 times. Take away a few holding penalties and they rush for 400+ yards and score 50 last night. Threw 2 passes.
Sometimes simple is better.
I think 4a is hough, weddington, or grimsley’s to lose. Hate that Indy gets this match up in the 2nd rd. Wish they got placed in the lower half of the bracket. They probably would’ve cruised through until they ran into weddington. I think Hough is good enough to beat grimsley this year. As for weddington, they probably have the best front 7 on the east coast. That alone will take them a long way.I think Hough is the best team in 4a but we have been here before. Indy kind of reminds me of some of those Chambers/Vance teams. Huge chip on their shoulder and playing with house money...they are not gonna afraid.
Hough would dominate Creek again.I hope to see a Hough.Mallard Creek rematch
Correct. The conversation around Mallard Creek's expectations seems to repeat itself year after year, and it’s important to recognize the weight of those expectations. The past few years, there has been a lot of skepticism about their consistency, and it seems like we're hearing similar concerns this time around. The gradual decrease in trash talk and reverse psychological posts from MC fans could indicate a more cautious approach, perhaps stemming from previous disappointments. While they have a strong program and a history of success, the pressure to consistently perform at such a high level can lead to challenges. Look back at last season, there were moments when they struggled against teams that were not traditionally seen as strong contenders. However, I have seen MC send many of the athletes to the most prestigious colleges. Good luck to both teams.The same thing was said about their ability to show up last season as well. Nothing but respect foe MC, I'm just saying this was the exact same conversation as last season.
Yup...just figured out who you are. How many screen names has this been? 8? 10?Correct. The conversation around Mallard Creek's expectations seems to repeat itself year after year, and it’s important to recognize the weight of those expectations. The past few years, there has been a lot of skepticism about their consistency, and it seems like we're hearing similar concerns this time around. The gradual decrease in trash talk and reverse psychological posts from MC fans could indicate a more cautious approach, perhaps stemming from previous disappointments. While they have a strong program and a history of success, the pressure to consistently perform at such a high level can lead to challenges. Look back at last season, there were moments when they struggled against teams that were not traditionally seen as strong contenders. However, I have seen MC send many of the athletes to the most prestigious colleges. Good luck to both teams.