ADVERTISEMENT

Way Too Early Discussion of 2021 Realignment

tarheelg

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2001
3,256
702
113
Creedmoor, NC
It's only about a year away before the officials in charge of realignment will begin looking at the new set of conferences for the four year cycle to run from 2021-2025....With this year's ADM numbers, I started tinkering with some numbers and realize they have quite a dilemma, and must say that I quickly discovered exactly why they went with the 20/30/30/20 model for the 2017-2021 cycle. As you might guess, if you follow high school sports (or politics) in NC and read a lot of message board banter, the primary complicating issue is charter schools: For years and years, the 25% rule worked well to separate the four classes, but now with SO many schools with enrollments of 300 or less, many of whom do not have a football program, going 25% across the board would put 104-105 schools in each class, but in 1A, only 68 of the 104 current schools in the bottom 25% of all schools actually have a football program. As many more charter schools have applied to open over the next few years, the number of non-football 1A schools will most likely continue to increase.

What the NCHSAA did for the 2017 realignment, to offset this problem of a disproportionate number of 1A schools without football, was go to a 20%/30%/30%/20%, using only the football playing schools (about 380) from the total number (about 420), then when they set the ADM range for 1A/2A/3A/4A, then went back and plugged in the non-football schools in the appropriate class, so we wound up with something like 78 4A schools, 114 3A schools, 116 2A schools (DSA & NCSSM without football), and 111 1A schools (including about 75 with football plus about 36 without it).

Looking ahead to 2021, many are clamoring to return to the old 25/25/25/25, but here's the problem: If we go to a straight 25/25/25/25 and use the same process of taking out the non-football schools to set the range for each class, then add them in after the class range is set, then we wind up with something like: 95 schools in 4A, 96 schools in 3A, 97 schools in 2A (these all seem reasonable) BUT....132 in 1A, with potentially 4 or 5 new ones added every year or two as more charter schools open...and bear in mind, about 36 or more of them do not have football)....perhaps the board of directors or realignment committee or whoever decides such matters would be ok with this, as it would allow both 1A & 4A football playoffs to probably go back to allowing 64 teams to qualify instead of 48. I think the most troubling aspect of this plan (if football schools are taken out when setting the range) is not that there are 132 1A schools, but that the ranges would be as follows: 1A would be ADM up to ~725.....2A would be ADM ~734-1019.....3A would be ADM ~1023-1506.....and 4A would be ADM ~1507 and up

For what it's worth, if they use the same 20/30/30/20 process they used for the 2017 realignment, and take out the non-football schools when setting the class ranges, right now we would be looking at approximately 76 4A schools, 116 3A schools, 115 2A schools, and 111 1A schools (only about 75 with football). The class range cut lines would be as follows: 1A ADM up to 626....2A ADM from 628-1013.....3A ADM from 1014-1596.....4A ADM from 1622-3513

If they go to a straight up 25/25/25/25 and not take into account whether or not a school has a football program....That would put 104-105 schools in each class, and allow 4A to probably go back to 64 teams in the playoffs (and 1A in many sports, not football though), and the cut lines would be as follows: 1A: ADM up to 592.....2A would be ADM 596-943.....3A would be ADM 944-1480......4A would be ADM 1482-3513.

Many schools will probably look much different next year, but remember one thing, just like every year if you go into the A or AA subdivisions for the playoffs: It's not just about whether or not your school goes up or down; it's about how much you rise or fall, RELATIVE TO EVERYBODY ELSE
 
Last edited:
Why is the NCHSAA so hung up on "4" classifications. Most states have 6-7-8 classifications.
Just do A and AA for ALL Classifications in ALL Sports. That fixes the size issue.
$$$$ to be made for the NCHSAA and more championships for schools to win. Win Win for both sides.

48ish team per Classification.
Conference can be whatever works, just like in the past.
32 teams make the playoffs in each Classification.
What system you want to use to get the 32.

It would look something like this based on this years ADM numbers.
4AA
Myers Park 3513
Ardrey Kell 3406
South Mecklenburg 3215
Panther Creek 2864
Olympic 2767
Green Hope 2765
Enloe 2734
Hough 2669
Broughton 2595
Mallard Creek 2594
Leesville Road 2551
Apex Friendship 2501
West Forsyth 2413
Garner 2372
Independence 2357
Millbrook 2346
North Mecklenburg 2338
Athens Drive 2313
Hoke County 2298
Wake Forest 2285
Cary 2278
Northwest Guilford 2276
Garinger 2273
Vance, Zebulon B. 2255
Fuquay-Varina 2245
Rolesville 2224
Butler 2179
Laney 2166
Richmond Senior 2159
East Meck 2138
Holly Springs 2118
Pinecrest 2117
Wakefield 2107
Hoggard 2102
Apex 2087
Providence 2082
Reagan 2075
Middle Creek 2049
Britt, Jack 2000
Lake Norman 1951
Page 1942
Ashley 1938
Jordan 1929
Clayton 1897
Lumberton 1893
Heritage 1891
Mooresville 1889
Sanderson 1881
4A
Cox Mill 1860
Hopewell 1859
Southeast Raleigh 1828
Cuthbertson 1820
Hillside 1814
Grimsley 1793
East Forsyth 1784
Davie County 1760
Marvin Ridge 1756
Reynolds, R.J. 1755
Overhills 1754
McDowell 1751
Riverside(Durham) 1744
Cleveland 1743
South View 1741
Porter Ridge 1720
Southwest Guilford 1719
Berry Academy 1715
Harding 1703
Hickory Ridge 1696
Pine Forest 1692
Rocky River 1671
Conley, D.H. 1665
New Bern 1664
South Caldwell 1649
Knightdale 1622
Central Cabarrus 1622
Kannapolis Brown 1596
Smith, Ben L. 1578
South Iredell 1575
Seventy-First 1568
High Point Central 1565
Roberson, T.C. 1560
Mount Tabor 1555
South Central 1550
Ragsdale 1548
Chapel Hill 1541
Weddington 1535
Cardinal Gibbons 1531
West Charlotte 1531
Cape Fear 1527
Parkland 1517
Northern Durham 1515
Corinth Holders 1509
Gray's Creek 1507
Scotland 1506
Rose, J.H. 1497
East Chapel Hill 1496
3AA
New Hanover 1493
Dudley 1488
Southern Alamance 1488
Glenn 1484
West Mecklenburg 1484
Sun Valley 1483
Swett, Purnell 1482
Topsail 1480
Harnett Central 1477
Lee County 1473
Northwood 1455
Northern Guilford 1445
Vance County 1437
West Brunswick 1433
Eastern Guilford 1421
Watauga 1410
West Johnston 1410
Alexander Central 1409
Southeast Guilford 1384
Western Harnett 1378
Reynolds, A.C. 1372
Piedmont 1360
Union Pines 1360
Erwin 1335
Asheville 1332
Western Guilford 1323
East Wake 1316
Southern Durham 1305
Smithfield-Selma 1296
Asheboro 1293
Orange 1285
Ashbrook 1274
Northwest Cabarrus 1272
Eastern Alamance 1264
Triton 1260
Carson 1259
Sanford, Terry 1258
South Johnston 1250
Robinson, Jay M. 1243
Byrd, Douglas 1235
Statesville 1234
Jacksonville 1233
Concord 1211
Hickory 1205
Hunt 1201
Smith, E.E. 1194
Charlotte Catholic 1191
Enka 1191
3A
Westover 1189
Williams 1183
Kings Mountain 1178
Franklinton 1177
Western Alamance 1176
Northside(Jacksonville) 1175
Aycock, C.B. 1162
Rocky Mount 1162
St. Stephens 1159
North Buncombe 1155
Crest 1150
Person 1150
Forestview 1147
West Carteret 1147
Freedom 1146
Fike 1145
North Davidson 1144
Southern Lee 1137
Rockingham County 1123
West Henderson 1121
Southern Guilford 1120
Parkwood 1119
North Brunswick 1118
Swansboro 1113
North Iredell 1098
Northern Nash 1097
Monroe 1089
Southern Nash 1085
Northeast Guilford 1084
North Henderson 1066
Southern Wayne 1062
North Gaston 1057
Huss, Hunter 1050
South Brunswick 1048
West Rowan 1047
White Oak 1047
Hibriten 1034
Cramer, Stuart 1032
St. Pauls 1027
Ledford 1023
Atkins 1019
Cedar Ridge 1018
North Forsyth 1014
Southwestern Randolph 1013
Havelock 1010
South Point 999
Nash Central 990
Pisgah 990
2AA
North Lincoln 988
Currituck County 983
Forest Hills 980
Tuscola 974
South Rowan 972
East Rowan 968
Cummings 965
Eastern Wayne 961
Central Davidson 952
East Duplin 951
East Lincoln 950
Burns 944
McMichael 943
Roanoke Rapids 938
Franklin 933
Ashe County 931
West Craven 931
Wilkes Central 929
Anson 919
West Caldwell 912
East Henderson 901
Bunn 898
Dixon 896
Washington 895
Richlands 891
Foard, Fred T. 886
East Burke 884
R-S Central 884
Salisbury 884
Shelby 884
West Stokes 880
Carrboro 877
East Gaston 872
Central Academy 871
East Davidson 871
Bunker Hill 866
Morehead 863
North Lenoir 863
Mount Pleasant 861
Jordan-Matthews 860
West Iredell 860
Newton-Conover 856
Croatan 852
First Flight 846
Hertford County 846
Bandys 842
West Lincoln 840
Forbush 839
2A
Smoky Mountain 838
Southwest Edgecombe 838
South Granville 836
Randleman 834
Maiden 832
Andrews, T.W. 830
North Surry 826
Owen 821
Patton 821
Clinton 808
Wheatmore 808
Graham 806
Lake Norman Charter 805
North Pitt 799
Lexington 798
Brevard 789
Midway 788
East Rutherford 786
Goldsboro 784
Chase 783
West Davidson 780
Lincolnton 775
Beddingfield 770
Madison 767
Hendersonville 766
Pasquotank County 766
Farmville Central 764
Yancey, Bartlett 762
West Stanly 757
South Columbus 750
West Wilkes 750
Greene Central 749
South Lenoir 746
Webb, J.F. 743
North Johnston 742
Providence Grove 740
Southwest Onslow 736
Trask 736
Granville Central 734
Oak Grove 732
Walkertown 725
South Garner 718
Red Springs 717
Surry Central 715
Reidsville 708
Spring Creek 705
Trinity 696
Whiteville 692
1AA
West Bladen 688
North Wilkes 677
Kenan, James 676
Bertie 675
Mountain Heritage 665
Northeastern 662
Thomasville 659
Ayden-Grifton 653
Pine Lake Prep 650
Eastern Randolph 648
Kinston 647
East Bladen 637
Wallace-Rose Hill 628
Pender 624
Draughn 618
Fairmont 616
Polk County 609
Bessemer City 605
North Stanly 601
Camden County 596
East Montgomery 590
Edenton Holmes 583
Carver 582
Princeton 582
East Surry 581
Louisburg 580
Warren County 578
Avery County 564
Tarboro 557
Highland Tech 550
Swain County 550
Mount Airy 542
Manteo 537
Starmount 536
North Moore 535
South Stanly 533
East Carteret 528
North Rowan 527
Riverside(Williamston) 524
East Wilkes 519
Comm. Sch. of Davidson 515
West Montgomery 511
Mountain Island Charter 509
Cherryville 508
Lakewood 504
Hobbton 501
South Stokes 500
Union Academy 495
1A
Rosewood 492
Mitchell 489
Union 484
Gates County 482
Murphy 470
Perquimans 462
South Robeson 450
Pamlico County 448
Northampton County 445
Alleghany 433
East Columbus 422
Chatham Central 421
West Columbus 420
Southside 411
Albemarle 410
Northside(Pinetown) 404
South Davidson 399
Lejeune 376
Bishop McGuinness 375
Hayesville 370
KIPP Pride Academy 362
Robbinsville 362
Washington County 355
Elkin 352
Rosman 343
Jefferson, Thomas 341
Northwest Halifax 340
Rocky Mount Prep 337
Weldon 326
Cherokee 324
North Duplin 322
North Stokes 321
Jones Senior 310
South Creek 245
Southeast Halifax 233
Bear Grass Charter 226
North Edgecombe 220
Andrews 209
Winston-Salem Prep 201
Cape Hatteras 185
Columbia 169
Mattamuskeet 104
 
  • Like
Reactions: Champ_24
Why is the NCHSAA so hung up on "4" classifications. Most states have 6-7-8 classifications.
Just do A and AA for ALL Classifications in ALL Sports. That fixes the size issue.
$$$$ to be made for the NCHSAA and more championships for schools to win. Win Win for both sides.

48ish team per Classification.
Conference can be whatever works, just like in the past.
32 teams make the playoffs in each Classification.
What system you want to use to get the 32.

No thank you but it will probably end up with all team sports subdividing eventually.

Some states allow privates to play with publics. Most states have expanded classifications in recent years.

In non football sports the competition is good and I hate to see that cut down. Non football sports can play more games and during the week so the playoffs can accomodate more teams but play down to four or so champions. I really like the competition factor in four classes.

I am against eight football champions and prefer four or five football titles although I think six is the perfect number and would get the teams in the playoffs that deserve to make it (192) and cut down on most of the teams that struggle to compete (224 down from 256 on the current alignment).
 
It's only about a year away before the officials in charge of realignment will begin looking at the new set of conferences for the four year cycle to run from 2021-2025....With this year's ADM numbers, I started tinkering with some numbers and realize they have quite a dilemma, and must say that I quickly discovered exactly why they went with the 20/30/30/20 model for the 2017-2021 cycle. As you might guess, if you follow high school sports (or politics) in NC and read a lot of message board banter, the primary complicating issue is charter schools: For years and years, the 25% rule worked well to separate the four classes, but now with SO many schools with enrollments of 300 or less, many of whom do not have a football program, going 25% across the board would put 104-105 schools in each class, but in 1A, only 68 of the 104 current schools in the bottom 25% of all schools actually have a football program. As many more charter schools have applied to open over the next few years, the number of non-football 1A schools will most likely continue to increase.

What the NCHSAA did for the 2017 realignment, to offset this problem of a disproportionate number of 1A schools without football, was go to a 20%/30%/30%/20%, using only the football playing schools (about 380) from the total number (about 420), then when they set the ADM range for 1A/2A/3A/4A, then went back and plugged in the non-football schools in the appropriate class, so we wound up with something like 78 4A schools, 114 3A schools, 116 2A schools (DSA & NCSSM without football), and 111 1A schools (including about 75 with football plus about 36 without it).

Looking ahead to 2021, many are clamoring to return to the old 25/25/25/25, but here's the problem: If we go to a straight 25/25/25/25 and use the same process of taking out the non-football schools to set the range for each class, then add them in after the class range is set, then we wind up with something like: 95 schools in 4A, 96 schools in 3A, 97 schools in 2A (these all seem reasonable) BUT....132 in 1A, with potentially 4 or 5 new ones added every year or two as more charter schools open...and bear in mind, about 36 or more of them do not have football)....perhaps the board of directors or realignment committee or whoever decides such matters would be ok with this, as it would allow both 1A & 4A football playoffs to probably go back to allowing 64 teams to qualify instead of 48. I think the most troubling aspect of this plan (if football schools are taken out when setting the range) is not that there are 132 1A schools, but that the ranges would be as follows: 1A would be ADM up to ~725.....2A would be ADM ~734-1019.....3A would be ADM ~1023-1506.....and 4A would be ADM ~1507 and up

For what it's worth, if they use the same 20/30/30/20 process they used for the 2017 realignment, and take out the non-football schools when setting the class ranges, right now we would be looking at approximately 76 4A schools, 116 3A schools, 115 2A schools, and 111 1A schools (only about 75 with football). The class range cut lines would be as follows: 1A ADM up to 626....2A ADM from 628-1013.....3A ADM from 1014-1596.....4A ADM from 1622-3513

If they go to a straight up 25/25/25/25 and not take into account whether or not a school has a football program....That would put 104-105 schools in each class, and allow 4A to probably go back to 64 teams in the playoffs (and 1A in many sports, not football though), and the cut lines would be as follows: 1A: ADM up to 592.....2A would be ADM 596-943.....3A would be ADM 944-1480......4A would be ADM 1482-3513.

Many schools will probably look much different next year, but remember one thing, just like every year if you go into the A or AA subdivisions for the playoffs: It's not just about whether or not your school goes up or down; it's about how much you rise or fall, RELATIVE TO EVERYBODY ELSE

Give the charters their own division. I will start a fund drive to buy the trophies. It would solve many issues that exist between the charters and traditional public schools. I know some of you will say, but there aren't enough who play football. I don't care how many play football. Let them all in the playoffs and crown the Charter School State Champion. They can play in mixed conferences, for travel purposes, if they want to. It would not be that much different than current split conferences. Just get them the heck out of 1A. Look at the past few years how they have dominated every sport but football. It is only a matter of time until they dominate it too. Traditional, rural, 1A schools have no chance against the charters when it comes to recruiting. Traditional 1A's are 1A for a reason. They are isolated and have no population from which to draw in more kids. The current system is insane. Please influence whomever you can. 1A always gets outvoted on this issue, because 2A, 3A, and 4A don't care. It's not your problem. Give us your votes and pressure the state to create a Charter School division.
 
I wish thet never would have started this A and AA crap. They should have just kept it as 1A, 2A, 3A, and 4A like other sports. Way too many trophies given out. We only need 4 champions crowned each year. Especially when you have 4-7 teams making the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: btango
Give the charters their own division. I will start a fund drive to buy the trophies. It would solve many issues that exist between the charters and traditional public schools. I know some of you will say, but there aren't enough who play football. I don't care how many play football. Let them all in the playoffs and crown the Charter School State Champion. They can play in mixed conferences, for travel purposes, if they want to. It would not be that much different than current split conferences. Just get them the heck out of 1A. Look at the past few years how they have dominated every sport but football. It is only a matter of time until they dominate it too. Traditional, rural, 1A schools have no chance against the charters when it comes to recruiting. Traditional 1A's are 1A for a reason. They are isolated and have no population from which to draw in more kids. The current system is insane. Please influence whomever you can. 1A always gets outvoted on this issue, because 2A, 3A, and 4A don't care. It's not your problem. Give us your votes and pressure the state to create a Charter School division.

There had not been any votes on charters. A vote on the three Parochial schools four or so years ago.

The NCHSAA admin would like to do something but they have basically been told “hands off” by the state legislature. Check your representative’s voting record on charters. They are starting to support them more in rural areas because that is where their voting base is. Find out where they stand!

You want to know how much power the legislature has...about ten years ago a rep did some pork belly politicing and had twonteams moved to a different conference. Vote first thing in the morning in a bill and the NCHSAA was not even notified. Caused a negative ripple effect.
 
There had not been any votes on charters. A vote on the three Parochial schools four or so years ago.

The NCHSAA admin would like to do something but they have basically been told “hands off” by the state legislature. Check your representative’s voting record on charters. They are starting to support them more in rural areas because that is where their voting base is. Find out where they stand!

You want to know how much power the legislature has...about ten years ago a rep did some pork belly politicing and had twonteams moved to a different conference. Vote first thing in the morning in a bill and the NCHSAA was not even notified. Caused a negative ripple effect.
Very interesting. I thought the NCHSAA was an independent association. I did not know they answered to any other agency.
 
There had not been any votes on charters. A vote on the three Parochial schools four or so years ago.

The NCHSAA admin would like to do something but they have basically been told “hands off” by the state legislature. Check your representative’s voting record on charters. They are starting to support them more in rural areas because that is where their voting base is. Find out where they stand!

You want to know how much power the legislature has...about ten years ago a rep did some pork belly politicing and had twonteams moved to a different conference. Vote first thing in the morning in a bill and the NCHSAA was not even notified. Caused a negative ripple effect.
And of course.....Even if a bunch of the pro-charter school legislators were voted out of office at some point, there's no guarantee that such policies relating to athletics would actually change, or any policy relating to charter schools already opened
 
Very interesting. I thought the NCHSAA was an independent association. I did not know they answered to any other agency.

“Answer to” is probably not the best way to describe. The legislature could vote to take high school sports away from the NCHSAA. Not saying that would happen but there was legislative posturing in Georgia the last few years.
 
And of course.....Even if a bunch of the pro-charter school legislators were voted out of office at some point, there's no guarantee that such policies relating to athletics would actually change, or any policy relating to charter schools already opened

It is much harder to put a horse in the barn than let him out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelg
It is much harder to put a horse in the barn than let him out.
I don't have a problem with charter schools, per se. It is the fact that they can select from many thousands of kids and still play 1A. 3A and 4A schools from many open, urban districts across the state recruit kids regularly and get by with it. The result is that certain teams dominate. In 1A, we have the same situation with the charters. The vast majority of the 1A teams are traditional and extremely isolated rural schools. They could not recruit, even if it were legal. Their school is in the middle of nowhere and way to many miles away from any other population. You can start up a charter in any city in the state, recruit from the entire city and more, and play 1A. My kids could not go to a charter school, if they wanted to. The closest one is almost 2 hours away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelg
I don't have a problem with charter schools, per se. It is the fact that they can select from many thousands of kids and still play 1A. 3A and 4A schools from many open, urban districts across the state recruit kids regularly and get by with it. The result is that certain teams dominate. In 1A, we have the same situation with the charters. The vast majority of the 1A teams are traditional and extremely isolated rural schools. They could not recruit, even if it were legal. Their school is in the middle of nowhere and way to many miles away from any other population. You can start up a charter in any city in the state, recruit from the entire city and more, and play 1A. My kids could not go to a charter school, if they wanted to. The closest one is almost 2 hours away.

Big Sky, I agree on the charter issue. I am not that sure that I agree the vast majority of 1A teams are traditional and extremely isolated or may be more specific play only with players that reside in the school's geographical district.
 
Big Sky, I agree on the charter issue. I am not that sure that I agree the vast majority of 1A teams are traditional and extremely isolated or may be more specific play only with players that reside in the school's geographical district.
Yes, but at the rate of charter school expansion, by the 2025 realignment, you might see charter schools outnumbering traditionals in 1A by a 2:1 (ratio or more), AND whether they go with 20 or 25% for 1A, you could see a bunch of traditionals under ADM 500 bumped up to 2A....that's fine if the 2A/3A cutoff is closer to 850 than 1000, but not ideal if that cutline keeps going up, as it has in recent years
 
My post was not really relevant to realignment but I think it is clear with so many non football playing schools the only way to align is to do it without non football schools included then add them in. By subdividing 1A non football sports the number of schools is not so overwhelming.
 
Last edited:
IMO there really isn't a simple way to "solve" the issue. The NCHSAA tries to keep things equal however, this can not happen. There is always going to be a school somewhere that believes it gets "screwed over." Other states as well are dealing with the charter school "problem" as well. I know in Texas (travel there for work every other week) they are trying to keep kids in public schools. They are investing into the schools, reducing state testing, including more vocational classes, etc in an effort to give all students a more well rounded education. They also have a rule in place that if a student chooses to attend a charter school they must sit out a year before competing. If I was an athlete and I knew I couldn't play a full calendar year of team sports I'd reconsider my decision. Also, why does it have to be an equal number in the smaller divisions? I've always been a fan of the district and regional set up and not west vs. east. The NCHSAA could help make this happen if they subsidized travel costs; which I know they could do since their mission is promote and help schools not make a profit for individual pockets.
 
Also, why does it have to be an equal number in the smaller divisions? I've always been a fan of the district and regional set up and not west vs. east. The NCHSAA could help make this happen if they subsidized travel costs; which I know they could do since their mission is promote and help schools not make a profit for individual pockets.

It does not. The setup once was based on cutoff numbers for each classification. Over the years different numbers of schools have been in classifications. 2A and 3A have never been much of an issue compared to 1A and 4A. In the 1970's and early 1980's 1A had around 35 football playing schools and the football playoffs were three rounds. 4A had about 70 football playing schools.

They subsidize travel costs but in my opinion they should do more on that.

If I understand your sectional/regional preference I believe the reason is due to the way the schools are geographically laid out in the state. If there was a set east / west line the number of schools in a classification could be much greater to one side of the predetemined lines. Also, the predetermined central point would cause a much more drastic shift in different classes.

I am not such a big fan of the sectional format which was basically what the pod system was. When the playoffs came it was when you played different teams not just a repeat of who you played during conference play. The pod systems failure was when one pod had three teams with one loss or less and a two loss team. The neighboring pod had three teams with four or more losses.
 
It does not. The setup once was based on cutoff numbers for each classification. Over the years different numbers of schools have been in classifications. 2A and 3A have never been much of an issue compared to 1A and 4A. In the 1970's and early 1980's 1A had around 35 football playing schools and the football playoffs were three rounds. 4A had about 70 football playing schools.

They subsidize travel costs but in my opinion they should do more on that.

If I understand your sectional/regional preference I believe the reason is due to the way the schools are geographically laid out in the state. If there was a set east / west line the number of schools in a classification could be much greater to one side of the predetemined lines. Also, the predetermined central point would cause a much more drastic shift in different classes.

I am not such a big fan of the sectional format which was basically what the pod system was. When the playoffs came it was when you played different teams not just a repeat of who you played during conference play. The pod systems failure was when one pod had three teams with one loss or less and a two loss team. The neighboring pod had three teams with four or more losses.

I understand the the downfalls of the pod system but if you add a point system to the mix wouldn't that change the outcome? Add points for wins, classification of opponents, road wins, etc.
 
The pod system was based strictly off of geography. It was used to alleviate travel which was mostly a 1A issue. If a point system were used it would move the teams out of their geographical pod. That is basically what seeding does, it takes the geography out of the equation.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT