Hardly anyone comment on this site anymore 😔not much chatter here on this great matchup ?????
nope kw any information picked up is always good but as above noted things areScots needs help with his pick.....lol i do too this is a tricky one
I do believe that Richmond is more battle-tested than Clayton. That and homefield advantage (maybe) will be the difference.
Denson is calling out Raider fans, too. Gotta show up!
24-13 THE RAIDERS 💛 💛 Game really wasn't that close. We should have won by more.
Your second sentence says "Richmond fans barely knew him". You do realize he is a former QB for Richmond 97 and 98 State champion?? Former assistant coach. You might want to research also I don't know anyone that was upset about hiring him just the opposite.The season started out blaming Richmond coach for his arrival and the game plan. Richmond's fan barely knew him and the blame begun. The fans begun with statements that Richmond would never make it this year because of the hired coach and the formation he planned to run.
It seems that the narrative around coaches often swings dramatically based on immediate results. Initially, it’s easy for fans to criticize a coach without fully understanding the complexities of their role, including the challenges of team dynamics, injuries, and the pressure of high expectations. When the team begins to win, as Richmond has, the atmosphere shifts. Fans rally behind the coach, celebrating the victories and attributing the success to their leadership. The moment the results waver, the same fans who once praised him can quickly turn to doubt and criticism. It's interesting to consider the psychology behind this. Fans are often emotionally invested in their teams, and the highs and lows of a season can lead to extreme reactions.
The pressure in playoff situations can be immense, and once a team hits a rough patch, all the praise can quickly shift to blame. It’s almost as if the narrative shifts entirely based on one or two games, Richmond fans quickly begin overlooking the hard work and strategic planning that went into the entire Richmond coaching staff season. As Richmond fans or any fan base, it’s essential to recognize that coaching is a multifaceted job that requires consistent effort and adaptability, especially under pressure.
It's what we call being human!The season started out blaming Richmond coach for his arrival and the game plan. Richmond's fan barely knew him and the blame begun. The fans begun with statements that Richmond would never make it this year because of the hired coach and the formation he planned to run.
It seems that the narrative around coaches often swings dramatically based on immediate results. Initially, it’s easy for fans to criticize a coach without fully understanding the complexities of their role, including the challenges of team dynamics, injuries, and the pressure of high expectations. When the team begins to win, as Richmond has, the atmosphere shifts. Fans rally behind the coach, celebrating the victories and attributing the success to their leadership. The moment the results waver, the same fans who once praised him can quickly turn to doubt and criticism. It's interesting to consider the psychology behind this. Fans are often emotionally invested in their teams, and the highs and lows of a season can lead to extreme reactions.
The pressure in playoff situations can be immense, and once a team hits a rough patch, all the praise can quickly shift to blame. It’s almost as if the narrative shifts entirely based on one or two games, Richmond fans quickly begin overlooking the hard work and strategic planning that went into the entire Richmond coaching staff season. As Richmond fans or any fan base, it’s essential to recognize that coaching is a multifaceted job that requires consistent effort and adaptability, especially under pressure.
Then act like itYour second sentence says "Richmond fans barely knew him". You do realize he is a former QB for Richmond 97 and 98 State champion?? Former assistant coach. You might want to research also I don't know anyone that was upset about hiring him just the opposite.
Richmond fans have an apparent contradiction in their behavior. It’s interesting to see how Richmond supporters can sometimes prioritize their loyalty to the team over the moral high ground they claim to uphold. When the coach was hired, many fans rallied around the idea of integrity and sportsmanship, often citing the importance of building a program based on ethical standards. However, as the season progressed and Richmond lost their first game to 71st, some fans instantly resorted to harsh criticism and even personal attacks on the coach and players, which seems to undermine the very principles they initially advocated. Also criticizing the formation coach is running. This kind of behavior raises questions about the authenticity of Richmond s convictions. What some of you have posted on here has contradicted the support they profess for the team. It's almost as if the pressure of disappointing results can lead to a selective memory regarding their moral stance.It's what we call being human!