For anyone wanting to know the Smoky Mountain Conference Boys Player of the Year and All-Conference selections:
https://t.co/L6GCKg34Ed
https://t.co/L6GCKg34Ed
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I wonder what criteria they look at for Player of the Year and Coach of the Year. I'm sure it's a tough call and each nominee is deserving but I have to disagree with both. Murphy Coach turned a mediocre team into a great team in one seasonFor anyone wanting to know the Smoky Mountain Conference Player of the Year and All-Conference selections:
https://t.co/L6GCKg34Ed
I wonder what criteria they look at for Player of the Year and Coach of the Year. I'm sure it's a tough call and each nominee is deserving but I have to disagree with both. Murphy Coach turned a mediocre team into a great team in one season
My bad, I thought this was the girls. I very well know it is by the coaches. I just asked a simple questionFirst sentence in the link:
"Here are the all-conference selections for Big Smoky Mountain Conference boys basketball as voted on by the coaches."
Well in any Player of the Year they always go by stats. In college or pro you see them put scoring, ppg, rebounds etc. if you go on Maxpreps she is only at the top of two stats. Don't get me wrong, she is a great player. But she didn't have her best year. What criteria would you use to pick Player of the Year ? The Senior from Murphy had a good year and led in a lot more stats and had 18 Double DoublesWhy not king for player of the year ? Who is your choice ?
Well I guess we are bias towards our own players. Scoring is generally the main thing one looks at. Pick out the top 3 or 4 players and see which ones out performed her. It's simple as that. It's not a popularity contest or who is the best athlete. It's who performed the best in the season and stats don't lieWhat's a lot more stats .. king led Wnc in steals and assists .. and scored 14 or so a game .. that's not conference that's Wnc.
Ok, take time and be open minded and go down every stat and out of say the top 5 in each category who would you pick. I still don't see King getting it. By the way, they don't look at things like running clock or just had a off night.ok lets go by your thoughts. you made me do my research. 25 for murphy avg 12 pts ... king avg 14.. I rest my case
Wasn't complaining just stating facts. I stated she was a great player but I think other girls had over all better year. And about complaining about running score up and putting starters back in. I hold strong on that comment and that's for any team that's does it. You know they are other good teams with good deserving players other than Cherokee. It isn't always about your team. Everyone likes to beat their chest for their own, I understand that but you have to be fair to every deserving student athleteking owned pts assists and steals. 25 had rebounds and blocks. Plus games like andrews and others where she only played half the game do matter. In fact wasn't it you who was complaining about Cherokee starters coming back in the 4th qtr and playing but then at the end of the year you want to measure stats for stats. Just give the girl credit she deserved it if coach would of kept her in she prob would of scored 20 a game she is also a very unselfish player which is why she leads in assists.
Conference winning coach.coach of year goes to conference coach.
Conference winning coach.
Well he lost to Cherokee twice by 40 or more. He was talented but poy doesn't come from 6th place team.
Who does he have offers from other than WCU?Why not? It is the player of the year, not the MVP.. The fact that he is D-1 commit with multiple offers speaks volumes for his ability.
Who does he have offers from other than WCU?
abad it also matters if you score all your points against the bad teams then barely score against the good teams..
That's bull crap. I've never heard such in my life. Good try thoughCause a good player on a bad team will take every shot and get more rebounds cause their team is bad and misses more shots. The best player on a good team doesn't take every shot and therefore not have as many points per game. That's simple math.
Wildcat you got to live in some other country.
If a kid on a bad team has to shoot the ball 30 times but makes 8 of them is that better than a player who shoots it 10 times and makes 7?
Player 1 avgs more points but whose better ... player 2
I understand your point and there is no true evaluation. But if the better team lost there best player they wouldn't be the better team. If the best player on a bad team is lost then they are still a bad team. I'm not sure the correct answer but in every level every league the poy comes from top 3 teams. Probably like Westbrook won't win poy in NBA
That's why I said to take time and go down all the stats of the top 5 players. I think you will be shocked st the shooting pct, shots att, etc. I did take the time and that's why I didn't agree. And I picked a player from another school other than Andrews.Wildcat you got to live in some other country.
If a kid on a bad team has to shoot the ball 30 times but makes 8 of them is that better than a player who shoots it 10 times and makes 7?
Player 1 avgs more points but whose better ... player 2