ADVERTISEMENT

A More Accurate Ranking? Honda Rankings Supplemental

mrhonda

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2012
2,164
1,049
113
Okay, Okay I admit. I'm off from work today and probably have more time on my hands than I should.

I tried a little experiment. I took my ratings and strength of schedule from Maxpreps. I took the 25 teams from my ratings and noted their Maxpreps strength of schedule. I then ranked the teams from 1 to 25 by strength of schedule. Then I took their strength of schedule ranking and added that to their ranking in my ratings. Then I took that number and divided by 2 and ranked the teams from lowest point total to highest.

For example Team A in my ratings might be ranked 20 (no team in particular. Just for illustration). But, by strength of schedule they may be ranked say 15. That total is 35. I divided that total by 2 to get a point average. So, for team A, their point average would be 17.5. I then ranked teams according to point average.

In addition, I did consider results on the field. Mallard Creek, Butler and Hough remain in their positions because they beat each other. Richmond, Page and Dudley were close. I put Richmond ahead of Dudley due to their win over Dudley and the same with Dudley over Page.

Thoughts?



1. Mallard Creek (8-2)

2. Charlotte Catholic (9-0)

3. Scotland (10-0)

4. Jack Britt (9-1)

5. Butler (8-2)

6. Hough (9-1)

7. East Forsyth (10-0)

8. A.L. Brown (8-2)

9. Middle Creek (10-0)

10. Richmond (9-1)

11. Dudley (9-1)

12. Page (8-2)

13. West Forsyth (8-2)

14. Wake Forest (10-0)

15. Vance (6-4)

16. Pinecrest (8-2)

17. Reagan (7-3)

18. South Mecklenburg (8-2)

19. Fuquay-Varina (9-1)

20. North Davidson (9-1)

21. Seventy-First (8-2)

22. Hillside (7-2)

23. Garner (8-2)

24. Wakefield (8-2)

25. Rose (7-2)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT